Story Of Ashoka Was Taught Wrong | Keerthi History #india #history #ashoka

source

49 thoughts on “Story Of Ashoka Was Taught Wrong | Keerthi History #india #history #ashoka

  1. No the last statement was completely wrong…each coin was given by pushya mithra shunga to those cutoff the head of jains and buddas first learn history properly…don't spread the false stories

  2. Reel में जो बातें कही गई हैं, वे Ashokavadāna की कहानियों पर आधारित हैं,
    लेकिन उन्हें ऐसे बताया गया है जैसे कि वे सिद्ध इतिहास हों — जबकि ऐसा नहीं है।

    वास्तविक इतिहास में अशोक का हिंसक रूप अशोक के अभिलेखों से प्रमाणित नहीं होता।

    यह अधिकतर बाद के धार्मिक आख्यानों का हिस्सा है, न कि तथ्यात्मक इतिहास।

  3. What is the moral limit of the story…
    Whether you are Muslim or Christian or Hindu or Buddhist.. If you have a killing spree, you will kill the innocents..
    Don't need to be a Muslim…

  4. History is always debatable…..even literatures are not taken on their face value….not everything written is true …… U should refer to the genuine sources…I hope U did ur atleast graduation from history and fid not study history from google

  5. Ok, then your forefathers went to ashoka feet to beg for their life that's the reason you are on earth because ashoka didn't killed your forefathers, stop spreading nonsense, ashoka was the real father of India from Egypt to China to sri Lanka you find ashoka pillers….jokers come on internet to speak shits

  6. Ashoka died in 232 BCE.

    The Ashokāvadāna was written about 400 years later (2nd century CE).

    That’s why historians (and Dr. Ambedkar too) give more weight to Ashoka’s own edicts than to these later Buddhist legends.

  7. Brutality, killings,conquering is supposed to be 'Great'…These so called greats wanted people to follow religion, be non-rebellious, peaceful, honest…so that the king can rule peacefully..Kings conversions are eyewash..

  8. Its same like saying if someone is hindu this means they automatically never eat veg 😂😂😂

    She is brahmin and hate how a deemed sudra person can rule , that's why she and other so called upper cast people trying deemed his success by distorting history. ..

    He did accepted Buddhism before kalinga but the full realization and leaving the his kingdoms was after kalinga..

    Shame on you
    Just want to promote brahman supermacy

Leave a Reply to @pradipnandy8220 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole