Is RPE Actually Killing Your Gains? (Response to Athlean-X & Critics)



Responding to Jeff Cavalier of Athlean-X, Greg Doucette, Mark Rippetoe and other critics of RPE. What does the science actually …

source

49 thoughts on “Is RPE Actually Killing Your Gains? (Response to Athlean-X & Critics)

  1. Question about RPE. Just started 3 weeks ago trying to do some volume bench work 5x5s. Typically 3 workouts/week. Was planning to go 3x, 4x, 5x each week However, found I could go 3x,5x then add 5 lbs and do it again. After 1st 2 additions, 2 weeks total (3 weight levels), took a week deload, then added 5 lbs today – still did 3×5, but last rep had to hold in lockout for about 5 seconds before I felt I could complete the last rep. At that point, would you consider the last set an RPE 10?

  2. I use a simple RPE system in my workout log — just underline sets based on how many reps I had left before failure. One line = 3 reps left, two = 2, three = 1 or none. It’s quick, visual, and helps me decide whether to add weight, add reps, or hold steady the next week. If a set feels harder than expected, I treat it like a warning: maybe I’m under-recovered, underfed, or need a deload. It’s not just about effort,,, it’s feedback!

  3. 4 years and still new comments? So I may as well dive in:

    New to training. 40 years experience mathematical modeling (MS in stat's, BS in bio). I (think) I understand RIR and RPE. If RPE = 10 – RIR then it is just redundant. What good is it? Why wasn't this most obvious question addressed?

    I've generally been going to an RIR of 0 or 1 depending on how I'm feeling and my # reps keeps going up from session to session. Seems pretty simple, really.

  4. What is with all the comments just listing out random names and addresses?

    I don't even think it's doxxing because there's no city or state attached to the street addresses, and none of the names are listed in the same comment as the address. Bizarre bot behavior.

  5. RPE10 for the enhanced lifter? I feel like the enhanced lifter should train like Arnold or Jay Cutler for example. All out mechanical failure. When i leave the gym I can only lift less than half the weight of when i started.

  6. Ya… sorry this wasn't convincing for me still. Especially in the beginner aspect. But I think this also applies much more to body building as opposed to general overall lifting for fitness. Even Dr Mike in your video says that beginners should focus on getting stronger… aka the weight on the bar. THAT is quantitative. BUT I do appreciate the perspective and Jeff's calm and measured approach and response to criticism.

  7. In strength and power lifting, it's counterproductive to go to failure. So for that, RPE is really useful. Even in bodybuilding, go ahead and burn yourself out and destroy you recovery taking everything to RPE10. Failure is disproportionately fatiguing. Even an RPE or 5 or 6 gives you gains. RPE though, I think more for powerlifting.

  8. Cavalier is an absolute charlatan. That isn't to say he isn't right some of the time (broken clock and all that), but he just puts out videos for clicks. He'll say whatever he needs to, to get you to watch even if it means contradicting something he said a week ago.

  9. When you're an athlete and you have health care professionals that are analyzing you in some case, you have to push yourself near to your limit just for certain things to show. When I was younger, my heart condition didn't show unless I was under extreme physical duress. At that time, I was a basketball player, and I could do long distance running, but I kind of dodged being in track. So a stress test for me will look very different from less athletic people. If it requires that much just to see issues with someone's heart, then imagine how much is required to actually study it to the furthest brink you can. For anything there's one thing I will say about studies that is unfortunate. There's a tendency of, in some cases, relying more on people who are professionals in a field when we're doing science for like music and neurology, for example. That usually ends up meaning that though the study could possibly be used by most people, some of the information would be irrelevant. This isn't always true. It's just something that I've noticed to be true.

  10. maybe I misunderstand rpe, but it seems like it's only good for people who do straight sets of 10. is doing a 5×5 or even doing tells into the 20-30s the same rpe, or would it be better to think of it as a percentage? if I was doing a 5×5 and had a rpe of 6, does that mean I did 1 rep, or 3?

  11. 10:13 , there might be a bit of a confirmation bias here, if I call RPE 8, being a stubborn know it all that I am I will push out two more and perhaps not quiet put the push in for the third.

Leave a Reply to @Fearless_DoGooder Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole