I Used The Worlds WORST Camera (And YOU Didn’t Notice)



Is This $100 4K YouTube Camera Actually GOOD?! ****** The Video FILMED With The $100 Camera: …

source

21 thoughts on “I Used The Worlds WORST Camera (And YOU Didn’t Notice)

  1. my KODAK BOX (1959) might also be useable. Focus was not yet invented then. Sharp were the edges of the rectangular BOX I remember. 6×6. Streaming only after 15 days when it is all develloped. alex

  2. I still use my 13 year old Sony HDR XR160 1080p handycam due to its hefty 160gb internal hardisk storage which comes in handy during long hours of full event coverage. Oftentimes I use my even older 2009 released standard definition Canon Legria FS200 for wildlife and bird close-up video due to its incredible long zoom telephoto capabilities. You are correct, it is the content that matters. Regular audience won't notice if you shoot in 4k, HD or SD as long as the video quality is steady and watchable, and as long as they loved watching your vids. In fact, curious viewers still watch the 240p resolution of the oldest and first ever YouTube video uploaded 19 years ago titled – "ME AT THE ZOO" which already garnered 330 million views and counting. And I'm still okay streaming 50 year old classic movies in standard 480p, or even 360p when internet connection is slow.

Leave a Reply to @Srgogo98 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole