I tried the new ‘Starfield’ update Beta…
Subscribe to my LIVE channel: @lukestephenslive — All my links: https://linktr.ee/lukestephens …
source
February 11, 2026
Headlines
"Harmony in Every Heartbeat
Subscribe to my LIVE channel: @lukestephenslive — All my links: https://linktr.ee/lukestephens …
source
Subscribe to my LIVE channel: https://www.youtube.com/@LukeStephensLIVE
well i am playing performance/60 on my Xbox Series X on my 65" LG HD OLED and NO VRR . looks good and I havent noticed any tearing, the fps is not consistent though but most of the time hits 60 or so It would seem…
Can i be a smart ass for a second? The one thing we cant complain about is how outdated this game feels. Because it is and they said it themselves. 25 years of development and 8 years to make. So yes theres alot of old tech in this game.
I think they will eventually bring it to playstation. Same with ES6. I could definitely be wrong. Just my thoughts. Have gamepass on xbox and make a shit ton of extra cash making PS players purchase the games. Not like they're selling a lot of xboxs for exclusives to make a big impact like PS and Nintendo do, may aswell cash in.
i disagree about the fallout 4 dialogue camera being better.
I believe the same as you, I think Bethsda did not include the maps because the did not want a user to know how little there is within their game
My biggest problem with Starfield…. Your perks don't matter. Or.. matter very little I guess I would say. There is no fun in trying different "builds" because they don't play any different…. IMO.
The small thing that kills it for me is seeing the same "Vents" on every planet, regardless of terrian, animals, plants, etc. Not every freaking planet has vents every 30 feet!!! That was world breaking enough for me to have lost faith in BGS because it is a small detail they could have accounted for with recycling landscapes and they just were lazy enough to not care. Side Note: I started on Morrowind so I guess in my mind they could have at least thought of it like that as seperate biomes for the planets themselves.
Is the game about space yet ?
constant crashes glitchy play was enjoying the game but its lost it way .no matter what I do it refuses to load certain parts ,crashes on saving this game it terrible to play/ I do no recommend playing it
I‘m still confused why people are so annoyed about planets that have nothing on them.
Most have no atmosphere that is literally just a rock, what do you expect of a game that uses real solar systems
I honestly think the dune buggy might have a fuel guage
If I regularly watched this guy, I’d probably end up sounding pretentious and probably never enjoy any games ever.
I can imagine the dune buggy is their hardest feature to implement.
Having huge spaces with nothing is what is needed in so many games, that people miss this is insanity. You don't have to fill every spot with something, there should be loads of dead spaces inbetween, loads of it. Sandbox games have this yet they are loved. What they need to do is make it possible to actually run through the entire planet if that is what you want. Not an illusion of sandbox open world.
I just completed my first play through and I didn’t visit no more than 30-50 planets and I’m being generous I’d rather have 20 plus planets full of stuff than 1000 that I will never care to see due to the lack of content and reward of visiting each planet… plus I wish there was more movement or actual point of piloting your ship than it just being a means of fast travel
I must say the theory of Starfield being a multiplayer game makes a lot of sense when you think of all the loading screens. Since you would have a personal session at every loading screen, makes a lot of sense sence if you consider why most stores in neon are behind a loading screen.
If you jump from apartment in new Atlantis, you can make your way all the way to landing pad without “leaving” area that you would need 2 load screens, why?
I will buy it the day there is planetary flight, landing, take off, free flight, being able to actually fly to a planet instead of fasttravel, etc … in other words, i will never buy it 🤭😂
I think one of the best ways they could solve the emptiness issue for all the planets is to allow the game to allow a massive multiplayer. Let people claim their own land and bases and stuff. The tech and everything required would absolutely be insane, but it could help with the exploration part of everything
The curse of Todd Howard takes another PC
So it's still bad, gotcha
That ain't enough for me to get back in it.
I got to play the game via the game pass, since I had the game pass anyway I personally had no sunken cost fallacy going on. So after 20 hours of boredom I had enough.
And yeah, the game is just fundamentally not good… 😢😢😢
Some side missions were goodish but that's it.. 💔
I just don't understand when will people realize the modern business model in gaming industry! From No man's sky to Cyberjunk, to Starfield and many others….AAA studios release games in stages now, they release playable versions and then slowly add things and features via 'updates'…..morality is not the point here. The fact that more it's been happening for almost a decade now and still people and youtubers act as if something out of the ordinary happened, is just a big sarcastic WOW moment for all you.
If detectCritique() {
while (true) {}
}
Spot on with the map. It makes it that much more apparent how empty it is.
You described a car. "It moves you forward instead of up now" Okay.. What did you expect? lol
The “empty fishbowls aren’t empty after you go explore the nothingness because you create poi’s as you go?
Wow, 1000 planets you say?
So, is that more or less than the 1,537,684,190,955,900 planets in NMS?
I feel that your assumption about the maps is absolutely spot on
Id almost go further to say that a producer requested they be turned off before release.
So no extra work was actually put in, the function was just toggled on instead