How The SpaceX Starship Will Bring People To Mars!
Go to: https://drinktrade.com/teslaspace for a free bag of coffee with select subscription plans! Last video: Why The Tesla Bot Will …
source
March 20, 2026
Headlines
"Harmony in Every Heartbeat
Go to: https://drinktrade.com/teslaspace for a free bag of coffee with select subscription plans! Last video: Why The Tesla Bot Will …
source
Go to: https://drinktrade.com/teslaspace for a free bag of coffee with select subscription plans!
That's an awfully small space to spend 2 weightless years in.
"I'm gonna have to science the shit out of this!" ……Watly
Iron Sky 😜
12:18 Use parachutes
No scumbag racist nazi fascists should be getting government contracts! Tesla sales dropping and they SHOULD!
Perhaps it is a bit far from expected, traveling to Mars is something that is now close to humanity.
Title grammatically Incorrect, and should say "How SpaceX's Starship Will Take Humans to Mars "
Reasons for Correction:
The definite article "The" is unnecessary here because "SpaceX" is a proper noun that doesn’t require it. Including "the" makes the title awkward and redundant.
"Bring" implies movement toward the speaker’s current location, while "Take" implies movement away from the speaker’s location.
Since we are on Earth, discussing movement toward Mars, the correct verb is "Take" (e.g., "take people to Mars"). Using "bring" would only make sense if the statement were made from Mars, which it is not.
The misuse of "bring" in this context is similar to saying something like, "I have going to Mars next year," which is grammatically incorrect.
Choosing Between "People" and "Humans":
"People":
Feels informal, inclusive, and relatable, emphasizing the potential for everyday individuals to travel to Mars.
Suggests accessibility and humanization of interplanetary travel.
"Humans":
Sounds more scientific, futuristic, and visionary, emphasizing humanity's collective effort to pioneer space exploration.
Evokes a sense of purpose and ambition for the species as a whole, making it more appropriate in the context of a groundbreaking endeavor like reaching Mars.
In this context, "Humans" is preferable because it aligns with the broader existential and scientific goals of the SpaceX Starship mission.
It's hilarious reading comments from all the space travel "experts"!😊
No. We're not sending people to Mars, through SpaceX, NASA or otherwise. At least, not in the timeline so promoted by the above two entities. Can't afford it, for starters. And when you do the research about how difficult it will be to sustain just 4 or 6 people on Mars for even 3 months, much less a year and a half, you'll readily discover that it's simply NOT worth the trouble OR the treasure! Besides, there's NO COMPELLING REASON to send people to Mars!
NO ONE IS GOING TO MARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Musk said Starship would land on Mars in 2024, but it's 2025 and Starship can't even get to orbit.
It was scheduled to land on the moon in the first quarter of 2024.
What happened to Hyperloop ?
More Musk vaporware.
Best find out more about the black night satellite first orbiting the polar region of the earth before charging to another planet
Artemis is an awful name
The moon is the way to go. No Zubrins crazy ass mars direct
We are going This is an absolute fact. Maybe not now or soon or even 10 years. But we are going folks. Make no mistake
i could have got to mars befoer that add finished
Space X needs to start sending GPS satellites and geo satellites Soo every meter is known early.👍
1. you say that space x had many failures, this is not true and sound degrading against space x. in comarison to other they did not have many failures.
2. nasa would only slow space x down.
I now wish Elon would go there right now
Given that Biden's spent 150 billion annually for his illegal alien voter creation program to attempt to steal yet another election, OOPS! We're on to you, DemocRATS. Just think what SpaceX could've done with 600 billion dollars over the past 4 years of the Biden Regime's corrupt garbage put towards getting to the moon again, and Mars with crewed missions.
Leave it to NASA to take 11 flights to the moon to get done what SpaceX will do in three missions.
SpaceX doesn't have a plan? Seriously dude? So SpaceX has no plan, but there's no other way for US astronauts to get to the ISS short of help from Russia? Okie dokie, pal.