Dragon’s Dogma 2 Review – The Final Verdict



Dragon’s Dogma 2 is not your typical open world game. It has an extreme aversion to holding your hand in even the slightest …

source

49 thoughts on “Dragon’s Dogma 2 Review – The Final Verdict

  1. I love this review…its strictly about the gameplay and the mechanics. So many other mainstream reviews make it about the reviewer and nonsense I don't care about. Well done sir.

  2. DD2 to me was a major disappointment. I've seen a previous post where someone said "you sneak in the castle twice fight a boss and that's it" and I was like that can't be true but to my surprise the main story is literally over just that quick. The side quests are extremely easy to miss and by the extremely limiting fast travel the game seems long but it's not. I give it a 6/10

  3. But I'm not going to play this game because it has a handful of micro transactions in a single player experience and because I'm a typical self entitled whiny gamer who likes to bitch about everything.

  4. I like how nobody likes microtransactions yet these companies keep thinking they will make money with them lmao. Are there any idiots out there who actually pay to play?

  5. “It’s time to scrutinize reviewers’ integrity following their receipt of emails regarding microtransactions in the game . Transparency is essential to discern truth from bias.”

  6. Wow! Do I feel like a total sucker. I will never listen to another "professional" reviewer again – esp this loser (Starfield 10/10) They are bought and paid for. $75 (with tax) for this garbage?

    Played on PS5. Hardly better than the first which is over 10 years old. Terrible frame rate, terrible combat, muddy graphics. This review has NOTHING to do with the micro-transactions.

  7. Dogwater. PC port is terrible and they thought it was a great idea to have micro transactions in a $70 game. It's like devs took a look at BG3, game of the year last year, and Hogwarts Legacy, the highest selling game of last year and just decided to the opposite. Keep in mind this channel gave Starfield a 10 so take their opinion with a grain of salt.

  8. All the reviews should be retracted in light of the reviewers being supplied different copies then retail. Hiding microtransactions is bad enough, but charging for character save slots is downright scummy.

  9. Microtransactions in a 75 euro singleplayer game? Yeah… Capcom can suck a fat one. Im not buying that game. How much did they pay you for this review?

  10. This is such a shill review. Barely any mention of significant performance issues and no mention at all of the microtransactions and inability to start a new character.

  11. Really, promoting stable 30fps with sometimes dips below as a positive thing… If this channel had the slightest ammount of credibility its gone by now, 95% certainly a paid review this one

  12. A $70 game that charges you to change your character model (IN A SINGLE PLAYER GAME, WHAT THE ACTUAL F…), can't start a new character, says fast-travel isn't necessary and you'll WANT to walk point to point but then has a $3 MTX for showing you where/unlocking all the fast travel points. Classic Capcom approach. The performance on console is hilariously poorly optimized, dropping to below 20 FPS countless times, the camera is a mess, the companion AI is barely there. The game simply isn't finished, don't buy this yet.

  13. for someone who likes to take time and explore every nook and corner, this is a perfect game for me. i played the hell of the first one and i will for this too lol

Leave a Reply to @Dynasty1818 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole