‘Asian Eyes’ Are More Common Than You Think



Get Nebula now: https://go.nebula.tv/kentobento Watch The Shocking Chinese Pork Bun Murders exclusively on Nebula: …

source

46 thoughts on “‘Asian Eyes’ Are More Common Than You Think

  1. Evolution people develop different types of anatomy for protection. The Inuit of the far northern part of Canada Greenland, our thought to be Asian because of their slanted eyes. however, this is to protect them from snow blindness they have an added outer layer skin on the eyelid. ✌🏼♥️🇨🇦

  2. But why claim it's an "asian" feature in the first place just because it became concentrated in those populations, you know? It could very well have been kicking around in human populations since before they left Africa and have changed and become more or less concentrated in different groups, with the Asians just being the most obvious. Therefore, it doesn't have to have come from "Asians," and the genetic story could be a lot more complex and nuanced than that.

  3. I feel people in the comments are saying they look Asian but in a form of thinking asian look better than other races. What if the video was "Black people DNA are More Common Than You Think?"

  4. I see this is an older video. I remember that a Chinese researcher who set out to prove that the Chinese came from Peking man and not “out of Africa”, had to announce just a few years ago, that upon conclusion of his research that the Chinese were a part of the Out of Africa theory. So, the epicanthic eye fold turns out to have originated in Africa and not the other way around. The Japanese came to a similar conclusion as well.

  5. The epicanthic fold is an evolutionary trait to reduce the amount of light entering the eyes, preventing snow blindness, so it makes sense it would stick around in Scandinavia for so long

  6. Im from Minnesota and there are tons of Norwegian and Swedish peoples here. I find we are somewhat similar but culture wise when i visit norway and sweden they can sometimes lack our "Minnesota Nice" type of community. Its weird our people came here in the 1800s because the vikings laid a big land claim stone here like 6 o 700 years b4 (Kenngisonton runestone) in Minnesota. You wonder if it was like are "genetic memory" of Minnesota that brought us here and not just because "oh the climate is similar" excuse we always get told.

  7. I think you are oversimplifying Eastern Europe. There has been well over a thousand years of influx of nomadic peoples from Asia before the Mongols. Some even retained their Asian identity and language and even statehood. On the contrary to what you believe, the Mongols forexample killed the majority of Hungarians with Asian ancestry, as they massacred the resisiting lowlands that were inhabited by the original Hungarians.(As was customary for the Mongols to kill all those who resisted subjugation). This is recent arcaheological and sociological data btw.

  8. Perhaps you need to study Biblical sources of information regarding Human-diaspora from 'Adam',. rather than depending solely upon the evolution-polemic, or genetic-mapping, which lead to more questions than answers? In Reality, obvious 'easily observed' outward-appearance vectors of Gene-mapping are much less significant than 'hidden' ,visually-unobservable vectors of DNA are much more significant and impactful, though have little to do with 'outward-appearance'.

  9. And of His signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth and the diversity of your languages and your colors. Indeed in that are signs for those of knowledge.
    Quran 30 :22

  10. Another thing to note is that finns and Sami, as well as Estonians and Hungarians, can trace their roots to the Ural region, which sits right between Russia and Siberia and considered by some as the border between Europe and Asia. It could be unrelated but I thought it was interesting to note

Leave a Reply to @JoacoBernales98 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole