“We’re Taking The Case Forward” Top Lawyer Chris Daw On Baby Reindeer



On Thursday the 8th of May 2024, Piers Morgan’s interview with Fiona Harvey, the woman identified as the inspiration for stalker …

source

50 thoughts on ““We’re Taking The Case Forward” Top Lawyer Chris Daw On Baby Reindeer

  1. I could not understand what her point of view was at all. I had to play her intro part three times and still didn’t get it. She was hard to understand and made no sense and was so rude. Please never bring her back

  2. That black women on the panel is flat out bizarre. She's a dumb person that thinks she's levels above the average person. She almost seems like shes on summit.

  3. Please stop putting this demented racist on air? How is it OK for someone to be that obnoxious in the first place and then, WORSE STILL, go on to justify that behaviour as being "black style"?? She's basically saying that it's just how black people talk: it's disgusting. Gross. NO.

  4. Imarn Ayton may have made some decent points but her delivery is aggressive. petulant and utterly painful to listen to. It's not necessary. Everybody else conducted themselves as polite, reasonable adults. My God.

  5. Netflix true story up next…. Psychotic Influencer puts hit out on a everyone that tries to disagree with centralist but ever-changing ideas. Martha Scott goes into hiding.

  6. About Imarn, she is an accomplished passionate speaker who is able to command and inspire listeners. The only thing she accomplished is me wanting to pull my brain out through my ears. What a total whack job.

  7. Ah yes, generational narcissism is evident here in Imarn, she will grind her axe against anyone who comes her way. Take note in Piers who operates an intelligent facade and her who has none, 2 very different types of narcissist

  8. Not a documentary or docu-series.

    As soon as a name is changed and the show has a 'writer', then it is fictionalised.

    Even writing 'A True Story' at the start is an unstable term as soon as the show is fictionalised.

    Anyone engaging with Piers or Fiona Harvey is trying to milk our system of litigation for money.

  9. Ive had to stop watching because im getting physically irritated with how much this woman is interrupting a civil conversation with her stupid trilling. Never give her a platform again, shes annoying, rude, inarticulate, delluded, and quite obviously just a complete pain in the arse in any field shes ever endeavoured in.

  10. That Imarn woman not only comes across as a complete narcissist, but also completely dumb. I'd never watch another episode if this idiot was on your panel.

  11. If they are unable to prove her prior convictions and sentencing, Netflix should absolutely be held accountable, and to be honest Piers makes a fantastic point that there is a huge ethical issue with allowing her identity to be so easily uncovered.

  12. That woman is unbearable. She's always rude,, obnoxious, loud & thinks she's right about everything .Why is she always on the show, regardless of the topic in question? She's clearly a narcissist, only wants to hear her own voice . If i see her on Morgans show from now on, im switching over. Plz get rid of her. PLEASE GET RID OF HER!

  13. @PiersMorganUncensored Could you please unplug Imans microphone? We are missing out on the rest of the panels opinions. Might be worth dimming her camera. The petulant school girl behaviour is ridiculous.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole