Liberal media starts to admit Trump prosecution in trouble



‘Outnumbered’ panel discusses how the media is reacting to the New York v. Trump trial and noticing concerns with Michael …

source

49 thoughts on “Liberal media starts to admit Trump prosecution in trouble

  1. I can't believe how this case wasn't thrown out already..There main witness Cohen is such a lying felon who's committed perjury the Congress already has lied his whole life and is just trying to go after Donald J Trump this is all political and Alvin Bragg to lose his job and he should go to jail. This is such a sham trial it's scary for every American

  2. what prosecution this is now documented evidence for the future court case of these illegal prosecutions of Donald Trump .these people are really that stupid FJB

  3. If DJT doesn't walk …which he should..on any / every point of actual law … he'll appeal for sure so it wont "hurt" him at all …if hes "found" guilty he still wins …it not only galvanises his base , but also draws many disaffected/disallusioned others who were "never trumpers" to him….thank you democrats…play stupid games …win stupid prizes 😅😅😅

  4. Cohen is only one witness.

    Evidence was reviewed by the grand jury ( not DOJ not judge not Biden as Trump claims) and determined there was justified evidence loads of it to pursue a trial.

    Depends on how both sides presents their case and persuade the jurors or how smart the jurors are.

    If Trump is innocent he doesn’t have to violate his limited gag order, lie, intimidate witnesses and jurors or get his red tie brigade to violate his gag order for him.

  5. These witch hunt Trials arent just keeping Trump off the campaign trail,they have become the Trump campaign!
    Thank you to all those involved in making Trump 2024 become a reality! MAGA!

  6. This girl is delusional… anyone that knows the court of law..
    Knows that the witness isnt who is on trial.. trump is on trial! We are looking to prove coehn went to prison for trump?? I dont get it

  7. Does it matter one way or another? Say he's convicted. Does he go to jail for "falsification of business records"? No chance in Hell. Fines? Sure. Parole? I doubt it, but what would it mean, showing up to his parole officer once a month? The only real negative impact would be with voters who may be tired of the antics and a conviction, but at this point, the cult membership is pretty much set.

  8. 7 years of cases each one has fallen apart for one reason or another a Russian collusion hoax and buried laptop story censored and band on social media and mainstream media this a unconstitutional election meddling plain and simple it doesn't take a rocket scientist if you see it any other way you are delusional the very people who whine about threats to democracy are the biggest threat ro our constitutional republic with democratic principles north Korea and China calls themselves communist democracys go figure

  9. He needs to be charged for perjury!! Somewhere this lying under oath needs to be taken seriously and the perjurer needs to pay the price! Cohen is a serial perjurer, when is he going to be held accountable!?

  10. Wow. Thanks for this example of why they call Fox News NEWSTAINMENT. Doesn’t matter if they believe Cohen. The jury doesn’t have to to convict!! Conviction SHOULD be quick (not much to deliberate about so far). This case is winnable for the prosecution on the documents alone (and seems like an iron clad slam dunk case once you add in the testimony of RELIABLE witnesses like Hope Hicks whose credibility no one disputes). The trial’s smoking gun is Weisselberg’s HANDWRITING ON BANK STATEMENTS explaining where the money was, where it went, when, and why. Cohen is just a convenient storyteller but the documents are unimpeachable witnesses whose stories Cohen brings to life. There is NO REASONABLE EXPLANATION FOR THE PAPER TRAIL in evidence OTHER THAN the prosecution’s case: the hush $ was paid to Ms. Daniels AND that TRUMP KNEW ABOUT the business record forgeries TO COVER UP the hush $ IN ORDER to hide the 30 second “encounter” from the public in order to subvert the 2016 election (by hiding Ms. Daniels’s story from the voters after the Access Hollywood tape came out so voters would not know Stormy’s story in time to vote against Trump—Trump won by a razor thin electoral college margin in 2016 and lost the popular vote, so it is hard to say what Trump did shouldn’t matter—THIS IS HOW HE STOLE THE 2016 election!). The rest of the case is essentially undisputed! The only “POSSIBLE” (but NOT “ REASONABLE” alternative explanation is if you think Weisselberg authorized the reimbursement to Cohen without Trump’s knowledge but Trump himself said in multiple books (which are in evidence in this trial and corroborated by UNIMPEACHABLE witnesses who testified about how Trump works) that Trump would NEVER EVER allow payments that big to be paid WITHOUT HIS DIRECT KNOWLEDGE AND approval. Weisselberg would have been fired immediately if Trump hadn’t authorized the payments himself. So since no one in the courtroom (well, no one awake and attentive) could possibly think there is even a REASONABLE possibility of that, which leaves NO REASONABLE DOUBT OF TRUMP’s guilt. Bye,bye, Don Snoreleone! I assume your time in prison will make your time in court feel warm and happy by comparison. So, there’s that!! 😆

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole