“I’ve Personally Emailed Richard Gadd” Piers Morgan’s Baby Reindeer Mailbag



Piers Morgan dedicates this week’s mailbag entirely to the comments on his explosive Baby Reindeer interview with Fiona Harvey …

source

42 thoughts on ““I’ve Personally Emailed Richard Gadd” Piers Morgan’s Baby Reindeer Mailbag

  1. This entire project is an interesting therapy for a victim. In a series, Martha went to jail, probably because the author was seeking for some kind of justice. They said it is true, because of marketing. Not a documentary, because it doesn't sell that well. Nonetheless, I still don't understand why the author wanted so much to produce that particular plot.

  2. Bless you for making it clear that that insane and destructive woman will never be back on any of your shows again. She depicts hatred and negativity and she lacks the necessary intellect to debate. I find her utterly despicable.

  3. Imarn behaved in such an uneducated manner – no human courtesy, no restrain, no intelligence….glad you will not be be hosting her again. I value freedom of speech and democracy- however communicating with skill & listening and responding appropriately are two of them ☮️

  4. Yet Piers you obviously love the $ you made from the interview! You paid her £250 pounds, when with your views you would’ve made at least £50,000 just on YouTube ads🤦🏻‍♀️

  5. If they hadn’t seen the Netflix show, I think a lot more people would view Fiona as credible. It’s like if Amber Heard had made a Netflix show about how bad Johnny Depp was, Depp might not have been able to get a fair hearing.

  6. Why you keep repeating that he had a drug addiction and a sex life ? Where does that stand in this conversation? Yeah he made mistakes but the fault will always be on the stalker

  7. Imo even if parts are true it reeks of misogyny and fat shaming. Ask yourself, would RG have reacted the same way if he'd been chased by an obsessive beautiful woman? ……..nope

  8. This man is acting insane
    How he wants a SA and stalking victim to apologize for talking about his story is absolutely outrageous
    And the way he is not even mentioning the r+pist is unbelievable
    His whole focus is on antagonizing Richard Gadd and victimizing the perpetrators
    He is using this whole story and sensationalizing Martha's part to engage views for himself
    Yikes

    Oh and one more interesting thing:
    That woman was rude and non deserving of having a platform for calling him out and interrupting after being interrupted. But Fiona, a woman who stalks Idk how many people, yells at them, ruins their work environment, SA's, harrasses multiple people taking them to the verge of tears, physically and verbally abuses, tried to take a disabled child from their mother just out of spite, gets violent and aggressive, is this poor misunderstood character and it's impossible to know where the truth lies?
    Incredible
    Looks like he doesn't like feeling the slightest contradicted. It makes him feel disrespected so he shuts down whoever does that. Piers can't stand 3 minutes of feeling disrespeted but somehow Richard Gadd should shut up about his years of trauma because of Fiona
    What a comedy show

  9. I don't blame Gadd for making Martha so similar to Fiona, the tv show might have still been a way to heal for him and why not try to make something beneficial (whether it is financial or emotional) out of trauma. It just sucks he has to legally deal with that decision now.

  10. Personally, I think Piers has done a good job with the coverage of this story…one that I would not normally even follow tbh. I like the diverse guests he has had on and the way they have approached it from a mostly objective perspective. Well done !!

    Oh and the decision to not have Ayton Imran on the show again was brilliant. Frankly I am surprised it took this long to boot her off. She has always come off as over-bearing, rude and obnoxious…and IMO, will not be missed !!

  11. Imarn is right? And she behaved exactly as I’ve seen you behave with your panelists. Interrupting everyone and not wavering in your opinion. Gadd has shared many times that the story is dramatized. What more do you want

  12. All been too easy for both of them make millions!!! Why cant anyone see this Pierce. Oh yes they good, but not that good. Yes she went in pub yes she made a scene lol all part of their plot. Wake up folks are you brain dead

  13. The black lady sorry dunno her name? Shouting and screaming over eveyone else seemed quite psychotic too lol. She seemed nuts? Ok i saw where she was coming from, but i watched the series too, and saw the true story thing, id never heard of it, but i did wonder who the famous person was he got off his head with, Rape??? He kept going back for more??? I think i know who he was referring too. But hey lets not go there, it might be in his drug fuelled fantasy, who knows. State of him. However he does come across as a fame hungry wannabe! But not a crack head lol. Got hes wits ok Which leaves ME To believe both him and Fiona planned the lot of it!!! And if they did 100% both of you!!! Both crazies but hey ever hear about the thin line? Fooled the world👍😅 Pierce i'd have a good think about this? Whos fooling who? Millions to be made takes a whole lot of plotting. Gadd has advantage and 10/10 for hair cut, makes him look not the sharpest tool in box! Oh they done a number on you all lol.

  14. I thinks its irrelevant whether she did or did go to court or even went to prison as it’s lie. Well she lied herself when she said she hadn’t stalked Gadd or hardly sent any emails even though he has tons of receipts and voicemails. Not to mention the previous lawyer she stalked and how she got the position and subsequently fired she didn’t walk, she was made to walk. She stalked that women for 5 years. She’s not credible if you lie about everything you did or deny. Netflix added a fictional court sentence but that doesn’t negate are stalking which she did do. If she sues Netflix she will have to admit she did stalk all receipts and the volume. You bet Netflix will approach previous victims ie lawyer and her receipts. She’s not the victim here.

  15. I am not protecting Fiona in anyway but why isnt his sa been mentioned!? If he was sa by a woman would it be mentioned!? No hate tho im genuinely confused

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole