Fiona Harvey To SUE Netflix | Piers Morgan Reads Out Her New Statement



Piers Morgan’s now infamous interview with Fiona Harvey, the woman internet sleuths quickly identified as the ‘real’ Martha Scott …

source

46 thoughts on “Fiona Harvey To SUE Netflix | Piers Morgan Reads Out Her New Statement

  1. Whether or not, a woman ( pretty sure Fiona) made Richards’s life and his family’s hell for 6 years. He never intended it to go viral – become a global phenomenon and Netflix series. That happened organically and of course as an actor/writer/creator he would take that opportunity. Who wouldn’t? His talent was recognised. Duty of care to Richard too!! Her nephew says she did go to prison and claims she’s a liar. Why didn’t Fiona just lie low? It would all be a storm in a D cup. Whether or not she stalked him. She – whoever it really was damaged other people’s lives and caused them hell so… you know where my loyalties lie and totally unbiased. I believe Richard

  2. Its a bloody disgrace how the whole panel except from one voice of reason (Andy) picture Fiona as a total victim. They never seem to be able to reflect upon the fact that they might be totally wrong nd thus compketely giving a platform to and enable a stalker. The silly lawyer states that Richard Gadd now cant say anything because then it might be bad for him. So,,Fiona steps forward "outs" herself, gladly l. comes out in tv-shows and get to say exactly what she wants. But Richard Gadd cant defend himself or say anything that proves he is right,because then he gets sued. You anglosaxians are so morally perverted and you think you are so superior to everyone with your legal systems and your ridicolous interpretation of freedom of speach. Of course there has to be room for a filmmaker to create a show, based on real life events, just like it is for any artist. Otherwise it is totally corrupted, nd censorship, the assumed stalker has every right, the victim none..

    Piers Morgan cant stand people with opposite views. Andy was the only sane voice there. Shame on the rest of the "panel* if they are incouraging and giving platform to a stalker.

    Is the panel handpicked by the royal highness himself,Morgan or what? The legacy of the least possible residtance, obviously

  3. The only reason why I know Martha’s real identity is because of Piers Morgan. I don’t recall Netflix or Gadd mentioning Fiona Harvey, ever. I wouldn’t have known and wouldn’t have looked for her. So.. who’s exploiting who ?
    Piers is not doing any better than any of the parties involved, actually……..

  4. Good to see you have replaced, Crazy Imarn Ayton with Andy Signore. Andy is very entertaining, and polite, also he has a great Youtube show of his own, I hope Imarn gets help for whatever she was on, this last time on Piers' show.

  5. How is a person gonna be able to tell a story in fiction if netflux can get sued for launching this series? To be able to create art we need to have freedom of expression. What if the rest is true, is Richard Gadd not able to tell his story,,asa filmmaker? Every artist and filmmaker uses his/her's real life experience in fiction.

  6. After watching Baby Reindeer, and if it was a true story, I wondered if the drug use may have created an exaggerated or alternative version of events in the mind of Richard Gadd.

  7. Netflix isnt going to respond, they are waiting for her to file a law suit.. to which she absolutely will not do.. because dhe knows shes lying..even the host of this show knows this, as yku can tell by what he advertises as upcoming shows..

  8. Heres your problem with ALL of the vidoes youve made off of her fosrt interview wirh you.. Richard Gad stated in the beginning of the show that she was a convicted stalker of SOMEONE ELSE, before she ever started stalking him .. re watch the show

  9. Fiona has said on her Facebook that she is suing Netflix for £11 million. Her Facebook page is full of mixed-up words, bad spelling and strange statements. It comes across as very erratic. Her Facebook sadly makes her look uneducated and makes her come across as attention-seeking, in my own opinion. She certainly isn't doing herself any favours.

    There is a lot of hate on her page and it would be better if she changed her Facebook settings to private, as she is complaining about the hate she is receiving via Facebook.

    To be honest I am surprised she hasn't reopened her Twitter/X account.

    In my opinion, I think she is very much enjoying all the attention she is receiving.

  10. We've still never seen 1 threat sent to her?! Also it says it was fictionalized at the very end frame of the show but it cuts to the next episode unless you let it play. Netflix will just pay her off she just wants a settlement $$$
    I think she's just trying to get on masked singer!

  11. I don't get this. This lady is crazy and has obviously committed criminal activity… If he made up the part about her being convicted I'm only upset that she actually wasn't. Maybe he should bring charges against her now. It's like she's coming after him all over again.

  12. I cannot believe Netflix didn't couch the excellent series with: 'based on truth' and 40,000 plus emails seems totally far fetched. Hope they can uphold their claims with evidence in court.

  13. Netflix are not stupid. They would have covered their selfs. Also for all we know she has not had contact with Richard for years till this release and thinks. this is my chance to get my love back! and if not end his career. All or nothing! – thats the real thing happening here I recon.

  14. i think his heavy drug abuse has caused him to hallucinate or fantasize about the facts vs fiction..he may have known her and lead her on a little and she thought he was interested but he took it further and made a story about her that was mostly fictional.who knows that even his rape story was factual..maybe consensual who knows…why hasnt that guy been exposed and easily found?

  15. Duty of Care..
    Netflix dropped the Ball Big Time..
    How did Netflix not do their Research × Homework? 🔎
    You went Under Oath in UK 🇬🇧 Parliament to say this was a True Story?
    She has a case..Fiona isn't a Convicted Stalker?
    They didn't even give her a notice that this Series was in the works?
    Where was the Contract × Duty of Care × they had to get her Permission × Knowledge that this was in the works..
    They should have Protected her Identity..instead of Replicating the Real Person..
    She has a Case..
    This was based only on 10% of the Real Story..
    How did Netflix Trust × Accept Gadd who is so Unstable, Delusional × Abuses Drugs, Alcohol..
    Burden of Proof..Show the Evidence..
    I support Fiona..
    She is a Educated × Smart Person..
    Justice ⚖ Justice ⚖

  16. Why are they so worried about Fiona the stalker. She’s a dangerous woman and it’s good people know who she is. Hopefully Netflix or any person doesn’t pay her off cause this woman will never leave them alone. She’ll be back for more $. Go to court with the psychopath.

  17. How can you prove somthing isnt real 😂 i mean im still waiting for these evidence i mean her appearance on the pierce Morgan show said it all for us but i just wanted to say isnt it innocent until proven guilty with evidence. Not prove ur innocent 😂

  18. I bet she’s absolutely loving the limelight, she’s a strange untrustworthy woman who doesn’t know what she is saying is true or false, someone found her Facebook messages and she’s clearly delusional, side note it shouldn’t be that hard to find out if she did prison time surely?

  19. Ill be honest here, im only watching because of Andy from popcorn planet, ive been watching his youtube channel forever. I'm so happy to see him on a bigger platform, not that his channel isn't. But it's more underground, for youtubers like myself. Emily D Baker is another one! . Keep him on and I'll watch more Pierce Morgan!!!!! 🌍🌍🌍🌍🍿🍿🍿

  20. It’s obvious this woman is off her rocker- first off- SHE is the one who came out and made it about her. The woman’s name isn’t the same … nor does it reference this woman at all. Hair color doesn’t even match. So she has essentially made this all about her ….

  21. It's cute to make money off the topic and keep talking about this. But Netflix didn't say this is an image of Fiona. What exactly would she be suing them for?

  22. Piers you’re such a low, self serving charter always having to draw the attention back to YOU now matter what the subject! “OH I’ve had journalists saying I shouldn’t have given her a platform, what do you think,was “I” wrong??” Show us the receipts Piers!!
    “I’ve been at the forefront of pop-culture” Oh there’s now been 13million views of MY interview with her, 30 million on TikTock”
    YOU are the epitome of what’s wrong with being online…look at ME ME ME!! Don’t break your arm patting yourself in the back!! 🤬

  23. If I were Amy Winehouse's family I would take Fiona Harvey to court for her FB post saying Amy was a drug dealer. If I were Kate Garraway I would be furious with the disgusting comments she made about Derek Draper. If I were any members of the Labour party I would take her to court for Defamation after the absolutely disgusting comments she made about Kier Starmer, Tony Blair and others. The evidence is out there even though she has removed her FB page now nothing can ever be taken off the internet once there. Specialists can recover that content and it was all made public until she had a lawsuit. The woman is a nasty revolting individual.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole