Costuming in Historical Fantasy vs. Historical Accuracy in Movies & TV // Bridgerton Costumes



Thank you to Hello Fresh for sponsoring this video (and for feeding me and making my life 100x easier)! Use code 10ABBY to get …

source

40 thoughts on “Costuming in Historical Fantasy vs. Historical Accuracy in Movies & TV // Bridgerton Costumes

  1. Thanks for the sweater love! It was a gift from Nicole for Christmas and it came from Sezane: https://www.sezane.com/us/collection/knitwear
    I also wanted to add an additional note about the costuming build for Bridgerton – the Costume Industry Coalition (the organization behind the Hamilton Spencer Jacket that Bernadette did the documentary for) did an IG post the other day about how there were costume shops all over the world who worked on the builds for Bridgerton – including the US, UK, Italy, Spain, and Bucharest. The level of organization that had to happen to make this series happens blows my mind and gives me just a little bit of anxiety. 😂

  2. Coming back to this years later now that the season 3 trailer and stills are out. The absolutely baffling fit of Penelope's dresses in seasons 1-2 make so much more sense when you realize that they were really trying to downplay Nicola's erm assets before doing the big 'glow-up' in season 3.

  3. Game of Thrones … "All that armour was not at all period-correct." … "Oh. But the Dragons and White Walkers were correct, right?" … "Uh-huh. Sure."
    —-
    Boxes of "poly satin" – LOL!

  4. Though I never got into Bridgeton as a series the costumes are sublime. I do agree that costumes in general are a tool to tell a story and don’t necessarily need to be historically accurate IF the story isn’t.
    What i personally find absolutely fascinating is HOW historical clothing is worn. Meaning how would you go along your day wearing x y or z. How does your posture or movement change etc. with a modern interpretation of historical clothing you obviously will have adaptations in how the garment is constructed etc. to fit an actor’s (for example) need for certain movements.

  5. Bridgerton was seriously one of the most awful TV series ever. Utter trite and garbage. No wonder our democracies are falling apart if this is peoples' standard visual diet. That show did not have a single redeeming feature for me. I cringed until I had to switch it off. Americans should leave attempts at period pieces well alone, unless its set in the US. Epic fail from me from me. A pile of woke garbage.

  6. Am I going nuts or is everyone simply oblivious of the fact that some of the characters in this movie would have NEVER, EVER graced society at that time?

  7. Love people roasting phillpa Gregory, I have nothing against her personally infact she's problay a nice person. But I hate her books can't forgive what she did to Anne and George 🤢. Or what she did to Anne making her a b*tch.

  8. I prefer my "Historical " Fantasy a bit more explicitly fantasy. Like, don't name-drop real historical figures, don't give us the date( in a calendar format that is used today) and it would be best if the setting wasn't in a real life place. Cause those stuff anchor the plot and it's human nature when you have specific details is to check them,compare to real stuff, do the math and nitpick . and worse, people who have little to no idea on historical details will see/read it and assume, that this artistic variation is, in fact, historically correct because it is anchored in that real time and place. And one doesn't even need to be creative: a fairytale opening style of "once upon a time, in a faraway land" is quite sufficient in most cases.

  9. The problem comes when a historical fantasy goes so far beyond the bounds of history as to drag us kicking and screaming out of the fantasy. Historical fantasies should be just fantastical enough but yet leave us happily in our history.

  10. And I would have liked them to have been at least a little historically appropriate. I know that most of us wouldn’t have cared if it was bedazzled or flocked with a flocking gun. But just putting a smidge of thought and care for the characters who had lines would really have helped.

  11. Nope they are not, they are just mostly confusing and poorly fit and weird and a bit boring. I lurved Marie Antoinette but wouldn’t go looking for the matches of what I saw in the movie and what she actually wore…

  12. I can’t begin to number the times I’ve yelled at a screen, either out loud or internally, “Where’s the damn chemise?! Put on a feckin’ shift! No one wears a corset/stays against bare skin!“.
    And yes, we’re always down for a Gryffie cameo.

  13. Me, casually looking at videos, when one (1) word hit me like a brick. "Can we overnight the shoes to Prague…" To Prague?! Abby Cox you´ve been in Prague!?!
    😆😆😆

  14. There is such a big difference to me when historically innacurate costumes are a deliberate, meaningful choice versus when filmmakers take a half-assed, couldn't be bothered to research approach to costuming. Or, worse, when they decide that it's more important to conform to modern notions of beauty/fashionability or even just to cater to modern misconceptions about what dress from that era is like. The costuming choices for Bridgerton make sense because that feeling of the fantastical is consistent with other elements of the film. It doesn't clash the way the costumes often do when the departures from historical accuracy lack intent and purpose.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole